The Bush Doctrine: Neoclassical Realism and US Foreign Relations in A Critical Era of Global Politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21212962Keywords:
Bush doctrine, US foreign policy, South Asia, Preemption, Democracy Promotion, War on Terrorism, UnilateralismAbstract
This article examines United States foreign policy in South Asia during the post-9/11 period, with particular emphasis on the role of the Bush Doctrine in shaping policy decisions and strategic priorities. It argues that the Bush Doctrine—characterized by the principles of preemption, unilateralism, democracy promotion, and reliance on military power—provided the overarching framework through which the George W. Bush administration responded to terrorism and broader international security challenges. These principles integrated various diplomatic, political, and military instruments that guided U.S. engagement in South Asia, especially in relation to Afghanistan and Iraq. The study employs the analytical framework of neoclassical realism to explore how systemic pressures interacted with domestic-level variables in the formulation and implementation of U.S. foreign policy. While acknowledging the influence of the international environment, the article emphasizes the importance of internal factors in translating external challenges into concrete policy choices. In particular, it examines the impact of presidential beliefs, elite perceptions, neoconservative ideology, and the decision-making processes within the Bush administration. The article further analyzes how President Bush’s worldview, which framed global politics as a moral struggle between “good” and “evil,” shaped the interpretation of threats and influenced the selection of policy responses. This ideological lens contributed to the adoption of assertive and interventionist strategies, including military campaigns and efforts to promote democratic governance abroad. By integrating insights from neoclassical realist theory, the study demonstrates how both structural and domestic factors combined to produce key U.S. foreign policy decisions in South Asia during the post-9/11 era.
Downloads
References
1. Biddle, S. D. (2004). Military power: Explaining victory and defeat in modern battle. Princeton University Press.
2. Boyle, M. J. (2008). The war on terror in American grand strategy. International Affairs, 84(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00699.x
3. Bush, G. W. (2002, June 1). Commencement address at the United States Military Academy in West Point, New York. The American Presidency Project. ucsb.edu
4. Bush, G. W. (2001, September 11). Address to the nation on the terrorist attacks. The White House. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010911-16.html
5. Bush, G. W. (2001, September 20). Address before a joint session of the Congress on the United States response to the terrorist attacks of September 11. The White House. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html
6. Deudney, D., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). Liberal world: The resilient order. Foreign Affairs, 97(4), 16–24.
7. Edgerton, G. R., Hart, W. B., & Hassencahl, F. (2007). Televising 9/11 and its aftermath: The framing of George W. Bush’s faith-based politics of good and evil. In M. F. Norden (Ed.), The changing face of evil in film and television (pp. 195–214). Rodopi.
8. Jervis, R. (2003). Understanding the Bush Doctrine. Political Science Quarterly, 118(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00398.x
9. Kagan, R. (2012). The world America made. Alfred A. Knopf.
10. Leffler, M. P. (2003). 9/11 and the past and future of American foreign policy. International Affairs, 79(5), 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00352
11. Löfflmann, G. (2024). The Bush Doctrine redux: Changes and continuities in American grand strategy since 9/11. International Politics, 61(4), 501–552. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00461-9
12. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342
13. Monten, J. (2005). The roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, nationalism, and democracy promotion in U.S. strategy. International Security, 29(4), 112–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2005.29.4.112
14. Pape, R. A. (2005). Dying to win: The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Random House.
15. Rielly, J. (2008). The Bush administration’s foreign policy legacy. Politique Américaine, 3(12), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.3917/polam.012.0073
16. Santos, M. H. C., & Teixeira, U. T. (2013). The essential role of democracy in the Bush Doctrine: The invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 56(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292013000200008
17. The White House. (2002). The national security strategy of the United States of America.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Quranic and Social Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















