The Role of Facebook and Instagram Hate Speech in Societal Polarization: Evidence from Pakistan in a Global Context

Shahnila; Dr. Muhammad Fahim Baloch

doi:10.5281/zenodo.15383008

Authors

Shahnila M.Phil Scholar, Department of Media Studies, University of Balochistan, Quetta
Dr. Muhammad Fahim Baloch Associate Professor, Department of Media Studies, University of Balochistan, Quetta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15383008

Keywords:

Hate Speech, Social Media, Polarization, Digital Governance, Pakistan

Abstract

The research explores the relationship between hate speech on social media and polarization in Pakistan. It examines the relationship between the way hate speech varies in developing, underdeveloped, and developed countries, along with its contribution to the social, political, and cultural divisions. The research examines the role of social media platforms in either fuelling or controlling hate speech and reviews the effectiveness of institutional and government responses in different regions. Finally, the paper recommends that developing, underdeveloped, and developed countries improve policy regulations and digital governance to reduce the negative influence of hate and minimize polarization in society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Akhtar, S., Basile, V., & Patti, V. (2019). A new measure of polarization in the annotation of hate speech. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35166-3_41

2. Akbar, M. and Safdar, A. (2024) ‘Exploring ethnic discrimination and hate speech in online political discourses: A comprehensive analysis from the Pakistani context’, Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(I). doi:10.35484/ahss.2024(5-i)25.

3. Ali Abid, A., Shami, S. and Ashfaq, A. (2021) ‘Facebook and hate speech: Analyzing relationship between consumers’ attributes and Islamic sectarian content on social media in Pakistan’, Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 11(1), pp. 453–462. doi:10.32350/jitc.111.2.

4. Ali, M., Azab, N., Sorour, M. K., & Dora, M. (2019). Integration v. Polarisation among social media users: Perspectives through social capital theory on the recent Egyptian political landscape. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.001

5. Al Jazeera. (2021, October 25). Facebook failing to check hate speech, fake news in India: Report. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/10/25/facebook-india-hate-speech-misinformation-muslims-social-media

6. Belcastro, L., Cantini, R., Marozzo, F., Talia, D., & Trunfio, P. (2020). Learning political polarization on social media using Neural Networks. IEEE Access, 8, 47177–47187. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2978950

7. Chaudhry, I., & Gruzd, A. (2019). Expressing and challenging racist discourse on Facebook: How social media weaken the “Spiral of silence” theory. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.197

8. Cohesion. (2024). Kenya’s National Action Plan Against Hate Speech. https://cohesion.go.ke/images/docs/downloads/Kenyas_National_Action_Plan_Against_Hate_Speech.pdf

9. Dixon, S. J. (2024, September 12). Facebook hate speech removal per quarter 2024. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1013804/facebook-hate-speech-content-deletion-quarter/

10. Davies, K. (2022, November 10). Cases of hate speech recorded by the police in Germany 2009-2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/961603/cases-of-sedition-recorded-by-the-police-in-germany/

11. Fleck, A., & Richter, F. (2024, October 21). Infographic: 2 in 3 people often encounter hate speech online. Statista Daily Data. https://www.statista.com/chart/33299/online-hate-speech-encounters/

12. Farooq, S., Zain, A. and Sartaj, S. (2024) Hate and polarization in society: A case study of imran khan and Maryam Nawaz Speeches, ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379929809_Hate_and_polarization_in_society_A_case_study_of_Imran_khan_and_Maryam_Nawaz_Speeches (Accessed: 10 May 2025).

13. Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2021). Social Media and political agenda setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390

14. Hassan, A.A.U., Fazal, H. and Khalid, T. (2020) Political hate speech in political processions: A comparative analysis of PMLN, PPP and PTI processions for election 2018, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences. Available at: https://pjss.bzu.edu.pk/index.php/pjss/article/view/920 (Accessed: 10 May 2025).

15. Katsarou, K., Sunder, S., Woloszyn, V., & Semertzidis, K. (2021). Sentiment polarization in online social networks: The flow of hate speech. 2021 Eighth International Conference on Social Network Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), 99, 01–08. https://doi.org/10.1109/snams53716.2021.9732077

16. LOC. (2024). Germany: Network Enforcement Act amended to better fight online hate speech. The Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2021-07-06/germany-network-enforcement-act-amended-to-better-fight-online-hate-speech/#:~:text=Background%20on%20the%20Network%20Enforcement%20Act&text=The%20Network%20Enforcement%20Act%20is,after%20receiving%20a%20user%20complaint.

17. Meity. (2024). The Information Technology (intermediary guidelines and ... https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (updated 06.04.2023)-.pdf

18. MacAvaney, S., Yao, H.-R., Yang, E., Russell, K., Goharian, N., & Frieder, O. (2019). Hate speech detection: Challenges and solutions. PLOS ONE, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221152

19. Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, hate speech, and Social Media: A systematic review and Critique. Television & New Media, 22(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230

20. Mahmood, F., Zahra, Ms.S.M. and Mehdi, Dr.A. (2024) The role of social media in amplifying hate speech: A qualitative analysis of Imran Khan and Nawaz Sharif’s rhetoric on YouTube, Policy Research Journal. Available at: https://theprj.org/index.php/1/article/view/226 (Accessed: 10 May 2025).

21. montrealethics.ai (2025) Democratizing AI Ethics Literacy, Montreal AI Ethics Institute. Available at: https://montrealethics.ai/ (Accessed: 10 May 2025).

22. Pérez-Escolar, M., & Noguera-Vivo, J. M. (2022). Hate speech and polarization in participatory society (p. 278). Taylor & Francis.

23. Ruggiano, N., & Perry, T. E. (2017). Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work, 18(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017700701

24. Reuters. (2024). Ox. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf

25. Sasu, D. D. (2023, August 3). Nigeria: Distribution of religions. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1203455/distribution-of-religions-in-nigeria/

26. Sharma, S. (2015). Caste-based crimes and economic status: Evidence from India. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(1), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.10.005

27. Szurlej, C. (2016). (PDF) preventing genocide against the Rohingya Muslim minority in Myanmar. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312277661_Preventing_Genocide_against_the_Rohingya_Muslim_Minority_in_Myanmar

28. Shafiq, S., Rehman, Dr.S. ur and Khanum, K. (2024) The role of social media echo chambers in promoting divisive opinions and hate speech, PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM. Available at: https://pjlaw.com.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/v3i9-96-104?articlesBySimilarityPage=4 (Accessed: 10 May 2025).

29. Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2019). Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology in Action, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_9

30. Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology (Vol. 7). Cyberspace.

31. Schäfer, S., Sülflow, M., & Reiners, L. (2022). Hate speech as an indicator for the state of the Society. Journal of Media Psychology, 34(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000294

32. Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139

33. Udanor, C., & Anyanwu, C. C. (2019). Combating the challenges of social media hate speech in a polarized society. Data Technologies and Applications, 53(4), 501–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-01-2019-0007

34. Urman, A. (2019). Context matters: Political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541

35. UN Women. (2024). Frequently asked questions: Tech-facilitated gender-based violence. UN Women – Headquarters. https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/ending-violence-against-women/faqs/tech-facilitated-gender-based-violence

36. USCIRF. (2024, October 23). Central Nigeria: Overcoming dangerous speech and endemic religious divides. https://www.uscirf.gov/publications/central-nigeria-overcoming-dangerous-speech-and-endemic-religious-divides

37. Vogels, E. A. (2021, January 13). The state of online harassment. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/

38. Yu, X., Wojcieszak, M., & Casas, A. (2023). Partisanship on social media: In-party love among American politicians, greater engagement with out-party hate among ordinary users. Political Behavior, 46(2), 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09850-x

39. Zandt, F., & Richter, F. (2024, June 18). Infographic: Meta’s hate speech problem. Statista Daily Data. https://www.statista.com/chart/21704/hate-speech-content-removed-by-facebook/